I
developed this literacy guide for middle school students to utilize in their
research and source qualification. The
guide is a general recommendation of research and approach based around 5 main
steps: Defining, decoding, evaluating, creating and communicating.
Define/Find:
Who
was the most popular poet in 2013? Who was the most popular singer in 2013?
The
most important part of defining an information literacy guide is determining
what you want the overall goal to be. The topic needs to be well defined, and a
rubric needs to be created. One needs
to know not only what the requirements are but also how it will be
evaluated. In the case of middle school
students, it may be something along the lines of online research and validated
sources. Once it is determined what the
research task is, the skills of research and development begin. Various media
sources can be utilized for information gathering: the internet, interviews,
peers, social media, blogs, wikis, T.V. and print (newspapers, magazines, periodicals,
etc.) are all sources that can utilized and validated.
Decode:
Why
were these people the most popular?
Once
the information gathering has begun, it is important to interpret the
information to criticize. It can be an
argument in agreement with or against the information presented, but gathering
it and deciphering just what the information means, and how it applies to an
individual theory takes a level of critical evaluation. There is no right or wrong when making
inferences about information, however it is important to be able to back up
statements with facts and details that support a hypothesis.
Evaluate:
How
were they the most popular?
Once
the information is gathered and organized, it needs to be evaluated and
validated. Because there are so many
sources of information available to us today, not all information communicated
to us is factual or legitimate. It needs
to be referenced from a validated source. Information can be cross checked
virtually immediately through any of the media’s referenced above, or through
multiple sources. Generally speaking,
scholarly journals and sites are considered acceptable sources; while
Wikipedia, social networks and blogs may need additional clarification and facts
finding to ensure the details are legitimized.
In addition, newscasts and articles may be “first release” versions and
require “additional information” before all of the details are clear or
validated.
Create
What
are some traits that make these individuals more successful than their peers?
Would
you argue someone else in their place and why?
From
here, we can create our own conclusions, and inferences from the information
presented to us. We make our own argument for or against suggestions and
theories presented in the research gathered.
Communicate:
Present
your arguments in a PowerPoint or speech presentation.
Agree
or disagree with the information gathered at this point. Find alternative points of view and
incorporate those into support of any arguments you may have. Site any sources utilized so that authors
receive credit for their work.
No comments:
Post a Comment